Tired of waiting for a letter, we went to see Planning this morning.
I didn't understand everything the woman told us, but she said it wasn't good news. Among the reasons given (as I understood them) were:
o the previous Planning Permission for a three-bedroom home has expired and we are no longer in a constructible zone (I'm still trying to see the logic here)
o someone has declared all "tourist villages" involving yurts will be refused
o the mayor does not approve (news to me)
o the department of agriculture does not approve
o the water people do not approve
Me: Really? The water people?
She: Yes.
Me: That's strange - they told me they would approve.
She: (PAUSE) You could always apply for permission to build a house.
I felt the meeting could have gone better. Not unexpected, this "Non". Just not worth waiting five months for. With a light lunch still stewing inside, I went to see the water people. It went something like this:
Me: Why didn't you approve?
He: But I did approve - look. (SHOWS PROOF. REACHES FOR PHONE. INTO PHONE) Where did you get the impression I didn't approve?
She: (ON PHONE) Who said you didn't approve?
He: (INTO PHONE) The English man. He's with me now.
She: (ON PHONE) The department of agriculture doesn't approve. Because they will cut down too many trees.
Which leaves me bemused in several ways. Here are two of them: why did she tell me the water people did not approve, when they did; and where did the department of agriculture get the idea from that we would cut down a load of trees?
If they bothered to ask, they would have found out we'll cut down a couple of saplings for each yurt (and there will be only three yurts in year one) which will be amply made up for with a 13-tree orchard, half an acre of ash and willow coppice, 20 blue spruce and a verdant hedge.
On top of this, we're giving 10% of our profits to reforestation schemes globally in an effort to ensure continuity of life on this planet (to get slightly politico-spiritual for a second).
Other questions pop into my head with regularity. Like: If she chose to be flexible (or even double-jointed) with the truth concerning the water people... What did the mayor really say?
I'm going to ask him tomorrow.
2 comments:
geez... French bureaucrats sound even worse than uk ones! Who'd a thunk it?
Not me, that's for sure. One of the reasons we didn't do this in Italy was because we heard the bureaucracy so insane. (Welcome to the blog by the way - I love people who actually comment!)
Post a Comment